bound rape

Virgin teen gets raped in her own house by a man. He forces her to do a blowjob then he fucks the young girl bounded

Shiney Ahuja rape case: Maid can be prosecuted for perjury Following media reports about the complainant who accused actor Shiney Ahuja of raping her More

Shiney Ahuja rape case: Maid can be prosecuted for perjury Following media reports about the complainant who accused actor Shiney Ahuja of raping her turning hostile, lawyers say she is liable to be prosecuted for perjury. The victim has made a statement before the magistrate under section 164 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC), which is admissible in court unless proven involuntary. The trial is being conducted in-camera before the Sewri fast track court. In-camera trial refers to a case where the court bars the media from reporting about the case as per section 327 of the CrPC, applicable in sensitive cases like rape. Advocate Majeed Memon said: "The victim's statement under oath has been recorded under section 164 of the CrPC at the investigation stage. That would mean two versions on oath from the same witness diagonally opposite. Both can never be true. One is bound to be false. Hence, she is liable for prosecution under perjury." In the Best Bakery case related to the 2002 Gujarat communal riots, a fast track court convicted and sentenced eyewitness Zaheera Sheikh and her sister in 2006 for perjury. In this case, she had told the Supreme Court that she was threatened by local politicians and wanted the case to be transferred outside Gujarat. However, before a Mumbai court, she changed her statement and was declared hostile. While leading defence advocate Sudeep Pasbola agreed that the hostile complainant can be prosecuted, he said it completely depends on her <b>...</b>
Hide